Is IBM Stock A Value Stock Or A Value Trap?

  • IBM's culture has caused major issues for the business and potentially creates a buying opportunity.
  • The company seems to have lost its way, but it's not too late for a recovery.
  • With a forward earnings multiple of 9x and a 4.2% dividend yield, is IBM a buy?

IBM (NYSE:IBM) trades at a forward earnings multiple of 9x and has a dividend yield more than 4%. The stock is either really cheap, or the market is sniffing out more trouble ahead with management’s current strategy. We aren’t ready to jump in just yet and keep the stock out of our Top 20 Dividend Stocks portfolio for now.

However, Warren Buffett sees value and added to his position during the third quarter of 2015 as IBM reported another disappointing set of results. IBM’s fourth quarter revenue declined for the 15th straight quarter and disappointed investors once again. While there is plenty of talk about how the move to off-premise cloud computing is hurting many of IBM’s “old technology” businesses today, IBM’s current struggles have been developing for years. The company’s sales fell 5% in 2013, 7% in 2014, and 12% in 2015, including divestitures. A smaller decline is expected in 2016, but it remains to be seen if management can finally stop the bleeding.

Despite stagnant revenue (sales were $91.1 billion in 2005 compared to $92.8 billion in 2014), IBM’s management team has obsessed over meeting expectations for earnings growth, trading off long-term business prosperity for near-term earnings “beats.” The company has repurchased about 40% of its shares since 2005 and implemented numerous cost reduction efforts, including substantial layoffs in recent years, to grow earnings. For a while, these actions looked to be working. Diluted earnings per share nearly tripled from 2005 through 2013 and operating margins doubled to hit 20%.  The IBM stock was a winner, significantly outpacing the S&P 500 from 2005 through 2011.

IBM stock chart

Source: IBM stock price chart by

However, IBM’s cost-cutting strategy finally caught up with it in several ways. In the technology sector, innovation is everything. Innovation thrives in a culture that rewards experimentation and new ideas, not layoffs and strict adherence to quarterly EPS targets. Gauging innovation and company culture is difficult, but a website called aggregates employee reviews for thousands of companies. As seen below, IBM ranks last in overall stars, the percentage of employees who would recommend the company to a friend, and the percentage of employees who approve of the CEO.

IBM Glassdoor Reviews

Source: Glassdoor

Culture is one thing. Financial decisions are another. As we mentioned, IBM decided to repurchase about 40% of its shares over the last decade, spending over $100 billion to get the job done and help “grow” earnings per share. While IBM was busy laying off employees, cutting costs, and repurchasing shares, one of its biggest competitors going forward, Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), was busy reinvesting into its business.

The chart below shows the amazing rise of Amazon’s R&D spending over the last decade. Amazon’s R&D went from $451 million in 2005 to a whopping $9.3 billion in 2014. Over that same time period, IBM’s R&D spend fell from $5.8 billion in 2005 to $5.4 billion last year and has slightly decreased each of the last three years.

IBM R&D Percent of Sales

Source: Simply Safe Dividends, Company Reports

From 2005 through 2011, IBM actually spent a greater proportion of sales dollars on R&D than Amazon did. Since then, Amazon’s rate has nearly doubled while IBM’s has consistently eroded since 2005.

IBM R&D Percent of Sales

Source: Simply Safe Dividends, Company Reports

With Amazon spending over $4 billion more per year on R&D than IBM, and also forcing other competitors to follow suit, IBM has some serious work to do if it wants to be a force in the fast-moving “strategic areas” it has identified – cloud, mobile, social, analytics, and security.

It remains to be seen if IBM can maintain its current rate of R&D spending while staying competitive in its legacy markets and also beating out competitors in areas such as cloud and analytics. If the company continues pinching pennies and takes its focus off of its core business, profitability concerns could be the next major concern which could crop up and hit IBM stock. IBM might also have to step up its R&D expenses to remain competitive, further pressuring earnings.

Fortunately for IBM, its legacy cash cows (mainframe-related hardware, software, and services) seem like they will continue generating nice profits for years, if not decades, to come. It just won’t provide any growth as it slowly erodes – thus the need for the company to reinvent itself while profits continue flowing in from “old tech” businesses.

While it’s far too early to evaluate the effectiveness of IBM’s ongoing investments to stay relevant, we can scrutinize its dividend.

IBM Dividend Analysis

While IBM is not yet a dividend aristocrat, the company has raised its dividend for over 20 consecutive years and shows no signs of stopping. IBM’s payout ratio is less than 40% on a trailing 12 month basis, leaving it with plenty of flexibility for growth. As seen below, IBM has grown its dividend at a double-digit annual rate over every time period during the last decade.

IBM Dividend Growth

Source: Simply Safe Dividends

IBM Valuation

IBM trades at 9x forward earnings estimates and has a 4.2% dividend yield. If the company can return to sustainable sales and earnings growth, it is clearly a bargain. However, accurately forecasting a turnaround is hard enough, and IBM’s case is particularly complex given its dependence on fast-changing and very competitive technology markets for future growth.

IBM is a massive company. Change takes time to play out. The IBM stock could very well turn out to be a big winner over the next five years, but its culture issues and questionable management decisions over the past decade make it equally likely to be a value trap in our view.

For now, we are happy to watch from the sidelines for some validation that IBM can be competitive and profitable in the strategic areas it is growing into. Missing the first 20% rally from the bottom is a risk we are willing to accept if it means that we get some clarity on IBM’s chances of a successful reinvention, reducing the likelihood that our investment becomes a value trap.


IBM has proven to be a durable giant over its more than 100 years in business and is an example of a blue chip dividend stock. Despite the stock’s disappointing performance over the past several years, the company continues throwing off mountains of free cash flow that can be used to drive growth in strategic areas of focus. Whether or not IBM’s current management team and culture can execute is a different question. The track record is not good, but the market is also giving them very little credit at the current stock price levels.

For investors living off dividends in retirement, IBM’s 4.2% dividend yield is very safe. Dividend growth should easily outpace the rate of inflation going forward as well. While no one knows if or when IBM will get through the challenges currently impacting the business, you can perhaps sleep a little bit better knowing that Warren Buffett continues to find the stock attractive.

For now, given the state of the company’s culture, the “me too” nature of management’s strategy, and the rapid pace of change in markets such as the cloud, we will wait to see some clearer signs of fundamental momentum before getting too excited.

Show Full Article
5 2
Is this article helpful ?    

Author's Disclosures & Disclaimers:
  • I do not hold any positions in the stocks mentioned in this post and don't intend to initiate a position in the next 72 hours
  • I am not an investment advisor, and my opinion should not be treated as investment advice.
  • I am not being compensated for this post (except possibly by Amigobulls).
  • I do not have any business relationship with the companies mentioned in this post.
  • See Amigobulls' policy on anonymous authors who use a pseudonym
Amigobulls Disclosures & Disclaimers:

This post has been submitted by an independent external contributor. This author may or may not hold any positions in the stocks discussed. Neither Amigobulls, nor any members of its staff hold positions in any of the stocks discussed in this post. Amigobulls has not verified the author’s positions in the stocks discussed, and does not provide any guarantees in this regard. The author may be paid by Amigobulls for this contribution, under the paid contributors program. However, Amigobulls does not guarantee the authenticity or accuracy of the information provided by the author in this post.

The author may not be a qualified investment advisor. The opinions stated in the post should not be treated as investment advice. Buying and selling of securities carries the risk of monetary losses. Readers/Viewers are advised to carry out their own due diligence and consult their investment advisors before making any investment decisions.

Amigobulls does not have any business relationship with any of the companies covered in this post. This post represents the views of the author/contributor and may not reflect the views of Amigobulls.

At Amigobulls, we prefer that our authors disclose their real names. However, due to a variety of reasons, author's may prefer otherwise. Recognizing the fact that the ideas conveyed carry greater significance, and to facilitate the dissemination of these ideas, we allow authors to use a pseudonym. However, we do collect the same of details from anonymous authors, as we do from others, like the author's real name and contact information. Of course, this information remains confidential with us, and is not displayed on the site.
Further, to protect the interests of our readers/viewers, anonymous authors are required to make the same set of disclosures as other authors. For more details, you can write to any of our in-house editors at

show more

Comments on this article and IBM stock

user profile picture
You mention the buybacks and yield, but make no mention of how those were funded.

What about IBM's capitalization ratio?
user profile picture
$4.5M performance bonus for Ginni Rometty in 2015 for all the financial struggles the company is facing! What can one say for a company whose board awards bonuses instead of firing bad ceos.
3 reply
Do share this awesome post