Why Facebook Is Not A Great Investment Option Now

  • There's a high opportunity cost of owning Facebook stock versus a consortium of large companies.
  • The relatively lower income generation makes valuations risky.
  • Continued equity dilution due to employee compensation and acquisitions is a risk as well.

For the past two years, Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) has outperformed the S&P 500 with a near 100% rise in its stock price. As a member of the FANG's (Facebook, Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN)Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX)Alphabet Inc-C (NASDAQ:GOOG), the world's leading social network became a favorite equity holding for technology bulls. With consistently increasing mobile revenue, a large and highly engaged user base and two of the most widely used mobile applications (Instagram & WhatsApp), investors may be tempted to purchase more Facebook shares. Long-term investors should, in fact, stay away from owning Facebook.

Cost Of Facebook Ownership

On March 11th, 2016, Facebook had a market capitalization of $310 Billion. Investors purchasing shares of a stock essentially purchase a portion of the underlying business. An individual seeking a long term investment can choose between buying shares of Facebook and buying shares of other companies or collections of companies.

For instance, to understand the opportunity cost, look at Facebook's market cap and see how that compares with a lot of other investment options, albeit not in a similar space. What does $310 Billion (Facebook's market cap) buy?

$310 B Options

$310 Billion will buy an investor all of Facebook giving them the world's largest social network and two leading mobile applications (InstaGram and WhatsApp). $310 Billion will also buy an investor the largest grocer in the U.S. Kroger (NYSE:KR), two leading consumer products companies Kimberly-Clark (NYSE:KMB) & Clorox (NYSE:CLX), a top asset manager T. Rowe Price (NASDAQ:TROW), the second largest US automaker Ford Motor (NYSE:F), an investment bank Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), an energy company that Warren Buffet has recently purchased a stake in, Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX), an agriculture machine manufacturer Deere & Co. (NYSE:DE) and $1 billion left over in cash.

Which option, the consortium or Facebook, should an investor purchase an ownership stake in? Which option has a moat and is likely to over perform for years to come?

Investors seeking a potential technology growth play can also find superior options over Facebook. As of March 11, 2016, $310 Billion would purchase all of Facebook or all of Amazon and Netflix; the "A" and the "N" in the FANG's. An investor with $x to invest can purchase either a portion of the world's largest social network (Facebook) or the world's largest e-tailer and cloud computing services provider (Amazon) combined with the world's largest streaming media service (NetFlix) and still have a portion left in cash.

TechPortfolio

Facebook can easily lose it's social networking throne to upstarts like SnapChat or whatever the newest social network will be, as other social networks have fallen behind in the past. Amazon has a large moat in retail with its warehouses and cloud services (AWS). NetFlix has it's award-winning original shows and licensing deals with TV and movie studios. Which investment is a better long term option? A portion of Facebook or a portion of Amazon and NetFlix combined?

Minimal And Future Income Generation

Once a company becomes large, income generation becomes a key measure of performance. A company can only be a growth stock for so long. By market capitalization, Facebook is the world's eight largest publicly traded company. How do Facebook's 2015 GAAP earnings compare to the consortium of companies used above?

2015 Income Generation

In 2015, Facebook earned $3.6 Billion while the consortium earned over $24 Billion in net income. An investor can allocate a certain amount of dollars to Facebook or to a consortium that earns almost 7 times as much annually. The consortium pays dividends while Facebook does not. Which option is a better long term investment? Do note that this also shows how much more expensive Facebook is compared to all of these companies.

Facebook bulls often counter such an argument with the fact that the company is still in a growth stage and profits do not matter. For comparison, Apple, once a darling tech growth stock, is increasing net income faster than Facebook but is no longer treated like a growth stock with its earnings multiple of 10.

Facebook will need to dramatically increase its net income for it market valuation to continue increasing. It will take Facebook years if not more to match the income generation of the consortium of companies mentioned above. Facebook will eventually begin trading at a multiple similar to Apple (10) or Alphabet (34) versus the current 85. So even if earnings do grow, the stock price may or may not move to reflect the same.

Share Dilution

In the past three years, Facebook has purchased WhatsApp ($19 B), Oculus VR ($2B), Live Rail ($500 M) and numerous smaller companies. All these acquisitions involved issuing of shares. Facebook, like other technology companies, also relies heavily on stock-based compensation for employees. Each acquisition Facebook has made and every stock option grant that is exercised dilutes the ownership of investors. Since going public in 2012, Facebook's total shares outstanding have consistently risen.

Facebook Shares Outstanding

Investors who purchase shares in Facebook can expect continual dilution in their ownership. Unlike Apple and Alphabet (formerly Google), Facebook has not begun a share buyback program. Owning stock in a large company ($300 B in market cap) that continually dilutes ownership is not likely to be a wise long-term investment decision.

Conclusion

Facebook's performance the past two years along with its large active user base and ownership of Instagram and WhatsApp may lead investors to think it's a long-term opportunity. However Facebook's large market capitalization leads to a large opportunity cost in owning shares, the company earns a significantly lower amount of net income versus an equally sized consortium and the company continues to dilute ownership with new share issuances for acquisitions and employee compensation.

Additionally, Facebook can easily lose it's social marketing throne to new upstarts like SnapChat or some other app. The majority of high-income individuals are already on the social network; the remaining few billions are likely to be mostly lower income individuals from less developed economies. How much growth in advertising can those customers bring? Not all that much I'd imagine.

Show Full Article
6 2
Is this article helpful ?    


Author's Disclosures & Disclaimers:
  • I am not an investment advisor, and my opinion should not be treated as investment advice.
  • I am not being compensated for this post (except possibly by Amigobulls).
  • I do not have any business relationship with the companies mentioned in this post.
Amigobulls Disclosures & Disclaimers:

This post has been submitted by an independent external contributor. This author may or may not hold any positions in the stocks discussed. Neither Amigobulls, nor any members of its staff hold positions in any of the stocks discussed in this post. Amigobulls has not verified the author’s positions in the stocks discussed, and does not provide any guarantees in this regard. The author may be paid by Amigobulls for this contribution, under the paid contributors program. However, Amigobulls does not guarantee the authenticity or accuracy of the information provided by the author in this post.

The author may not be a qualified investment advisor. The opinions stated in the post should not be treated as investment advice. Buying and selling of securities carries the risk of monetary losses. Readers/Viewers are advised to carry out their own due diligence and consult their investment advisors before making any investment decisions.

Amigobulls does not have any business relationship with any of the companies covered in this post. This post represents the views of the author/contributor and may not reflect the views of Amigobulls.

show more

Comments on this article and FB stock

user profile picture
machobunny
neutral
Right. Lots of options. Some of us will note that FB has grown at average rate of 34% per year for the past 5 years and has the corner on huge things to come. Right...buy GE.
2 reply
stocksman
neutral
The question is do you invest for growth or for profits? The question is whether Facebook can continue to grow next five years at same rate? Can it eventually earn similar profits as the basket of stocks author talks about?
2
Do share this awesome post